Every organisation
EU AI Act compliance checklist for organisations that use AI: record-keeping, logging and audit evidence
The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is the EU's rulebook for AI systems, with duties scaled by risk: banned practices, strict obligations for high-risk systems, transparency duties for AI that interacts with people, and rules for general-purpose models. It binds providers and deployers whose systems are placed on the EU market or whose output is used in the EU, UK organisations included.
Not sure this rule covers you? See who each rule covers
The rule
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744)
- Who it covers
- Organisations that provide or use AI systems in the EU, including UK organisations whose AI serves people in the EU or whose AI output is used there.
- What it asks
- Be open about AI: people must be told when they are interacting with an AI system, and AI-generated or manipulated content must be disclosed or marked.
- For high-risk uses, such as hiring, credit decisions and education: human oversight, monitoring, and keeping the logs the AI system generates (at least six months for organisations using it).
- When
- The transparency duties apply from 2 August 2026. The high-risk duties for uses such as hiring, credit and education apply from 2 December 2027, moved from August 2026 by the Digital Omnibus.
- Sources
- EU AI Act, Digital Omnibus on AI
Provider or deployer: which one are you?
A provider develops an AI system or has it developed and places it on the market under its own name. A deployer uses an AI system under its own authority in the course of business. Most organisations connecting Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code or Cursor to their own data are deployers. You become a provider if you put your own name on a system you built or substantially modified, or if you use a general-purpose model to build something high-risk.
Deployers have fewer duties than providers, but not none. The checklist below is written for deployers.
The dates
| Duty | Applies from |
|---|---|
| Prohibited practices (Article 5) | 2 February 2025 |
| General-purpose AI model obligations | 2 August 2025 |
| Transparency duties (Article 50): telling people they are dealing with AI, marking AI-generated content | 2 August 2026 |
| High-risk systems listed in Annex III, such as hiring, credit scoring and education | 2 December 2027, moved from 2 August 2026 by the Digital Omnibus on AI |
Check the dates against the Digital Omnibus text before you plan around them: it changed the high-risk timeline in 2026 and may be amended again.
Deployer duties for high-risk systems (Article 26)
- Use the system in line with the provider's instructions.
- Assign human oversight to people with the competence, training and authority to intervene.
- Make sure the input data you control is relevant and representative for the intended purpose.
- Monitor the system's operation and tell the provider, and where relevant the market surveillance authority, about serious incidents.
- Keep the logs the system generates, under your control, for at least six months unless other law says longer.
- Tell workers' representatives and affected workers before putting a high-risk system to use at work.
- Where you make decisions about people, tell them a high-risk system is involved.
- Carry out a data protection impact assessment where the GDPR requires one, using the provider's information.
Transparency duties for everyone (Article 50)
From 2 August 2026, people must be told when they are interacting with an AI system unless it is obvious, and AI-generated or manipulated images, audio, video and text published to inform the public must be disclosed or marked. Deployers of emotion recognition and biometric categorisation systems must tell the people exposed to them.
The EU AI Act compliance checklist for deployers
- List every AI system in use, who uses it, what data it reaches and what it can do. Include the AI apps on people's laptops, not just the ones IT bought.
- Classify each use: prohibited, high-risk (Annex III), transparency-only, or minimal risk. Record the reasoning.
- For each high-risk use, name the person responsible for oversight and the provider contact.
- Decide how you will keep the system's logs for six months, and who can read them.
- Put the transparency notices in place: in the product, on the content, in the HR process.
- Make sure the DPIA covers the AI use, and that the record of processing lists the AI apps as recipients.
- Set the controls in advance: which tools an AI app can call, what it must never send, who reviews what.
- Keep a record of what each AI system actually did, so that an incident, an audit or a complaint can be answered with facts.
- Review the list when a new app, tool or model arrives.
Record-keeping and logging: what the record should show
Article 12 requires providers of high-risk systems to build automatic logging into the system; Article 26 requires deployers to keep those logs. For AI apps that call tools, the useful record is at the tool boundary: which app called which tool, for which user, with what arguments, what came back, and whether a control blocked or changed it.
ContextGate keeps exactly that record for every tool call made through it, with policies that block, warn or redact set in advance and the blocked and warned calls showing them working. It is evidence for the oversight and monitoring duties, not a classification of your systems: working out which of your AI uses are covered, and at what risk level, stays with you.
The report
EU AI Act Proof Report
EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
A record of what your AI apps did and the controls around them, for the EU AI Act's logging and oversight duties.
What it covers
- Every tool call your AI apps made: what was called, with what arguments, and the outcome.
- Policies and switched-off tools as controls set in advance, with blocked and warned calls showing them working.
Who needs it
Organisations that provide or use AI systems in the EU, including UK organisations whose AI serves people in the EU.
What you still do
Work out which of your AI uses are covered and at what risk level, then meet the duties that apply.
Questions people ask
Does the EU AI Act apply to UK companies?
Yes, where their AI systems are placed on the EU market, used in the EU, or where the output of the system is used in the EU. A UK firm whose chatbot serves EU customers, or whose AI screens applicants in an EU office, is in scope as a deployer or provider.
When does the EU AI Act apply?
In stages. Prohibited practices since 2 February 2025, general-purpose model rules since 2 August 2025, transparency duties from 2 August 2026, and most high-risk obligations from 2 December 2027 after the Digital Omnibus on AI moved them from August 2026.
What is a deployer under the EU AI Act?
An organisation or person using an AI system under its own authority in the course of business, as opposed to a provider, who develops the system or places it on the market under its own name. Most organisations connecting AI apps to their own data are deployers.
What records must a deployer keep?
For a high-risk system, the logs the system automatically generates, kept under the deployer's control for at least six months. Deployers must also be able to show the human oversight arrangements, the monitoring, and the information given to workers and affected people.
What are the penalties under the EU AI Act?
Up to 35 million euros or 7% of worldwide annual turnover for prohibited practices, up to 15 million euros or 3% for most other obligations, and up to 7.5 million euros or 1% for supplying incorrect information, with lower caps for small and medium-sized enterprises.
A summary, not legal advice: check your obligations with your compliance team or adviser.
Ready to see what your AI agents do?
Create a free workspace and add ContextGate to your AI apps in minutes. No card required.
Get started free
We'll email you a sign-in link to set up your workspace.
Rather talk it through first? Book a 30-minute call